« 'shrooms | Main | Alternate alternate reality »

The faith-based presidency

Update: The article can now be found at Truthout, in full, registration-free

The New York Times' Ron Suskind describes George W Bush's metamorphosis into Nehemiah Scudder:

''This is why he dispenses with people who confront him with inconvenient facts,'' Bartlett went on to say. ''He truly believes he's on a mission from God. Absolute faith like that overwhelms a need for analysis. The whole thing about faith is to believe things for which there is no empirical evidence.'' Bartlett paused, then said, ''But you can't run the world on faith.''

More:

The aide said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."

I'm sure the late postmodern philosopher Derrida would have approved of the notion that the US goverment creates its own reality. And facts that contradict this reality are brushed aside:

Lantos went on to describe for the president how the Swedish Army might be an ideal candidate to anchor a small peacekeeping force on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Sweden has a well-trained force of about 25,000. The president looked at him appraisingly, several people in the room recall.

''I don't know why you're talking about Sweden,'' Bush said. ''They're the neutral one. They don't have an army.''

Lantos paused, a little shocked, and offered a gentlemanly reply: ''Mr. President, you may have thought that I said Switzerland. They're the ones that are historically neutral, without an army.'' Then Lantos mentioned, in a gracious aside, that the Swiss do have a tough national guard to protect the country in the event of invasion.

Bush held to his view. ''No, no, it's Sweden that has no army.''

The 6-page article describes Bush's devolution from "a self-help Methodist, very open, seeking" to "a messianic American Calvinist [who] doesn't want to hear from anyone who doubts him." Where that journey will end is anyone's guess.

(Via ... uh... everyone, but especially the Ancient and Hermetic Order of the Shrill)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 18, 2004 9:55 AM.

The previous post in this blog was 'shrooms.

The next post in this blog is Alternate alternate reality.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34