« Asterix... | Main | Rogues of Clwyd-Rhan leaves Modern Tales, launches new storyline "The Green Knight's Belt" »

In America, everything is porn now

Warren Ellis writes that:

Tucked deep inside a massive bill designed to track sex offenders and prevent children from being victimized by sex crimes is language that could put many Hollywood movies in the same category as hard-core, X-rated films.

The provision added to the Children’s Safety Act of 2005 would require any film, TV show or digital image that contains a sex scene to come under the same government filing requirements that adult films must meet.


Under the provision inserted into the Children’s Safety Act, the definition of sexual activity is expanded to include simulated sex acts like those that appear in many movies and TV shows.

The provision, written by Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., could have ramifications beyond simply requiring someone to ensure that the names and ages of actors who partake in pretend lovemaking as compliance with Section 2257 in effect defines a movie or TV show as a pornographic work under federal law. Industry sources say the provision was included in the bill at the behest of the Justice Department.

Industry officials contend that the way the provision is written, a sex scene could trigger the provision even if the actors were clothed. While the language is designed to capture “lascivious exhibition of the genitals,” other legal decisions have said that “lascivious exhibition” could occur when the genitals are covered.

The bill, with the Section 2257 provision included, already has been approved by the U.S. House of Representatives and is waiting consideration by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Industry executives worry that the provision, which is retroactive to 1995, will have a chilling effect on filmmakers. Faced with the choice of filing a 2257 certificate or editing out a scene, a filmmaker might decide it’s not worth getting entangled with the federal government and let the scene fall to the cutting-room floor, the executives said…

There is, of course, no reason to suppose that the bill does what it says on the tin. As the Reuters report mentions:

"Guys who are making [child pornography] don't care about reporting requirements," one source said. "When they're caught, they're looking at 30 years in prison. There's no indication they're going to fill out the paperwork."

(via Eric M, who also points out that digital images = webcomics).

I'll just add the blindingly obvious observation that this nonsense was proposed by a Republican, has passed a Republican-dominated House, will easily pass a Republican-dominated Senate and will be upheld by a Supreme Court that the Republican president is now stacking with his Republican cronies. The only hope that the entertainment industry has is that it will turn out to be as big an administrative nightmare for the government as it will be for them.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 15, 2005 11:49 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Asterix....

The next post in this blog is Rogues of Clwyd-Rhan leaves Modern Tales, launches new storyline "The Green Knight's Belt".

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34